top of page


When world building and word predicting collide.
Where AI-enhanced accreditation (currently) sits. A few weeks ago I was presenting ten days of work to a university client – a detailed accreditation methodology built from the ground up. The report was substantial. The analysis was deep. And on the front page, as we always do, there was a disclosure that the deliverable had been produced in part using AI. The client paused. Looked up, and asked: "So why should I pay you for something I could produce myself using Co-Pilot?" I

Mark Runnalls
Apr 294 min read


The 80-page problem
The real bottleneck in accreditation assessment Accreditation is infrastructure. That’s not a metaphor – it’s the World Bank’s conclusion. Its flagship World Development Report, published in December 2025, is the first comprehensive global analysis of what quality standards really do for economies. It names accreditation as one of four pillars of quality infrastructure globally, alongside metrology, conformity assessment, and standardisation. Countries with stronger accredita

Mark Runnalls
Apr 175 min read


The UNESCO 2026 roadmap calls explicitly for accreditation systems that are more relevant and impactful
Accreditation is economic infrastructure. It’s foundational to development as roads or power grids. The World Bank’s 2025 World Development Report makes this striking claim. The UNESCO 2026 roadmap for transforming higher education points in the same direction. Taken together, the case is clear. So, that leaves us with the question: Who holds the infrastructure accountable? Accreditation bodies operate with significant delegated authority. They set the standards that deter

Rob Kay
Apr 92 min read
bottom of page