AI Competency Requires Assessment, Not More Courses
- Mark Runnalls

- 6 hours ago
- 2 min read

Last week. A large UK organisation. 10,000-plus workforce. They want a skills inventory and a program to close the AI fluency gap.
We walk them through what rigorous assessment actually looks like. What it measures. Why it matters.
And then the response - the one we hear constantly right now:
"But surely our HR platform can do this? It checks who's done what course, identifies the gap, gives them a list of courses to complete. It's not exactly complicated, is it?"
That's the problem in three sentences.
AI course completion is not AI competency. A list of modules ticked tells you that someone started and finished a learning experience. It tells you nothing about whether they can apply AI judgment under professional pressure, in regulated environments, in decisions that carry accountability. And a workforce that has completed AI training is not the same as a workforce that can apply AI judgment in professional practice: under scrutiny, in decisions that carry accountability. In Europe, that's no longer just a performance question. Under the EU AI Act, AI fluency carries compliance obligations for organisations and their directors.
88% of employees say effective leadership is critical to their organisation's AI success. Only 48% believe their leaders are actually ready.That gap doesn't close with more training.
It closes with assessment. Rigorous, contextualised, practice-based assessment that tells you and the people who rely on your professional standards who is genuinely fluent and who has just watched the videos and got the badge.
We've spent two years talking about AI skills.
We haven't spent enough time asking how you know whether someone actually has them and who is best placed to test that.
Behind every completion metric is a professional who deserves to know whether their investment in a credential is actually worth their time and money, today and in six months time.
Part 2 of 3. More on that soon.
¹ Udemy 2026 Global Learning and Skills Trends Report


Comments